Could Strange beat PCI in court?

Published 1:12am Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Attorney General Luther Strange’s latest attempt to halt gaming at Poarch Creek facilities takes a unique approach: Strange asked the court to enjoin the tribe’s activities because they are, he said, “a public nuisance.”

“I have lobbied Congress to stop the expansion of Indian gambling to new areas, and I have filed a brief in the Alabama Supreme Court to oppose the Poarch Band’s efforts to use its land for gambling,” Strange said. “As I have said many times, my office will use every tool at its disposal to stop illegal gambling in Alabama, wherever it is located. This lawsuit against the Poarch Band is one of those tools.”

But a leading political expert in Alabama said that while Strange may have a case, he does not expect it to prevail.

Bill Stewart, a political science professor emeritus who specializes in Alabama politics and has authored several books on the state’s constitution, said Strange is likely fighting an uphill legal battle.

“It’s my understanding that gambling was allowed in the state on Indian land,” Stewart said. “My understanding was that they weren’t necessarily limited to the types of gambling they could operate. It’s iffy because Native Americans have been given quite a bit of latitude. I think that (Strange) does have a leg to stand on, but I think it’s going to be a difficult case to ultimately prevail on based on previous decisions related to Indian gaming.”

Stewart said the current laws protecting operations on Indian lands will be difficult to change.

“It is sufficiently ambiguous enough to warrant revisiting, but the outcome is by no means certain,” he said. “That’s my understanding, that they have latitude and are not strictly limited to what is authorized as far as the state is concerned.”

Stewart said, given the federal protection surrounding the casinos owned by PCI, many state residents may view the attorney general’s lawsuit as a waste of time and money.

“I would say Strange’s litigation is very problematic,” Stewart said. “We know that in the Republican Party, anti-gambling is high on their list and I’m sure the religious right would say, ‘I’m glad he’s doing that,’ but it could be argued that resources could be better used elsewhere.”

As for whether or not the attorney general’s campaign against Indian casinos is nothing more than a political move aimed at garnering support for a future run at the governor’s office, Stewart said, “I would not rule that out.”

If that’s the case, Strange might have a hard time finding votes in Escambia County, at least with some voicing their opinions on social media Tuesday following the lawsuit announcement.

Cystal Kelley, a Wind Creek employee, said the casino is vital to the economic well being of many local families.

“They shut down the casinos and unemployment will sky rocket,” she wrote on Facebook. “I have worked there for two years. So has my husband.”

Some people pointed to the jobs that Poarch has provided in the area — as well as the donations of money to Atmore Community Hospital, local schools and other organizations.

“It’s called gambling which means you take your chances,” posted Leslie Holland George. “If you are depending on winning at a casino to pay your light bill then you probably shouldn’t be there anyways. That casino employs a lot of people from this area and if it wasn’t for them Atmore would eventually be nothing.”

Other residents are calling for Strange to refocus his efforts on other areas.

“Spend our tax dollars to protect the snapper that they are ‘blowing up’ in our sick gulf,” wrote Laura Phillips Fancher. “Figure out how to increase jobs in our state. Quit wasting tax dollars because you’re jealous of the Indians casino. The Bible belt won’t let them have gambling so they attack the Indians. Who, by the way, have given millions to schools and communities in our state! Can you match that Mr. Strange?”

Katie Nichols said she believes the state’s violent crime and drug problems should take precedence over gambling on Indian land.

“They went after the casino in Shorter, Ala. and a few others and failed miserably,” Nichols said. “Now they are looking to save face and go after federally protected interests. Millions of taxpayer dollars wasted for them to fail … again. How about instead of going after something that is not hurting anyone you go after all the real criminals? Meth lab owners, rapists, killers. You know, the ones you are supposed to be prosecuting?”

Others, though, supported Strange’s lawsuit.

“Is the money really worth it?” posted Kristie Hammac McGhee. “Only the rich are getting richer. … It’s not even helping their own other than a divide among themselves.”

 

Leave a comment

You must be a registered user and signed in to comment on this article.

One response to “Could Strange beat PCI in court?”

  1. dougmathews55

    IT IS PEOPLE LIKE MR. STRANGE THAT HAS RUINED OUR GOVERNMENT IN THE GREAT STATE OF ALABAMA!
    IT SOUNDS MORE LIKE A PERSONAL ATTACK ON PCI!

    THE PEOPLE OF ALABAMA NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT GAMBLING IS NOT A CRIME, IT IS A MATTER OF CHOICE!

    WE THE PEOPLE HAVE A RIGHT OF CHOICE GIVEN TO US BY OUR CONSTITUTION!

    WITH ALL OF THE BUDGET CUTS COMING FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT, THAT WILL BE PASSED DOWN TO THE STATE BUDGETS, THIS CASE NEEDS TO BE THROWED INTO THE GARBAGE CAN! IT IS A WASTE OF STATE FUNDS TO PERSUE THESE ACTIONS BY MR. STRANGE. THIS IS TAKING MONEY FROM THE STATE BUDGET THAT COULD BE PUT TO BETTER USE!

    PCI HAS DONE A LOT OF GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE OF OUR COMMUNITY!

    MR. STRANGE, I FOR ONE AM CALLING FOR YOUR RESIGNATION FROM YOUR POSITION AND FEEL THAT YOU SHOULD NEVER BE ALLOWED IN A STATE OR FEDERAL GOVERNMENT POSITION!!!

    WAKE UP ALABAMA CITIZENS! WE NEED TO GET PEOPLE LIKE THIS OUT OF OUR STATE GOVERNMENT!

Editor's Picks

Please go vote

In less than one week, voters will go to the polls to begin to determine who will be the next leaders of our state and ... Read more